Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Potassium silicate plus micronutrients gave the least stem fly injury, measured by tunnel length and larvae number.

A claim from SUPPRESS OF SOYBEAN STEM FLY, Melanagromyza sojae (ZEHNT.) BY SPRAYING OF POTASSIUM, MICRONUTRIENTS AND THEIR COMBINATION AS FOLIAR APPLICATION ON FOUR SOYBEAN VARIETIES · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium silicate plus micronutrients gave the least stem fly injury, measured by tunnel length and larvae number.

Taxon
SOYBEANGlycine maxt0
Treatment
potassium silicate+micronutrients (Fe, Zn and Mn) (P1M+)e0
Interactor
soybean stem flye0pest
Outcome
length of the tunnel and number of larvae inside the plante0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUPPRESS OF SOYBEAN STEM FLY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28
e0

“treatment of potassium silicate+micronutrients (Fe, Zn and Mn) (P1M+) was the least injury for soybean stem fly through injury indicators which were the length of the tunnel and number of larvae inside the plant and there was no significant between varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–678

Title

SUPPRESS OF SOYBEAN STEM FLY, Melanagromyza sojae (ZEHNT.) BY SPRAYING OF POTASSIUM, MICRONUTRIENTS AND THEIR COMBINATION AS FOLIAR APPLICATION ON FOUR SOYBEAN VARIETIES

Hanan Alfy; Rasha El-Hosary; SH. Yacoub; et al. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology /Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology 2016. doi:10.21608/jppp.2016.50080

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-305decffd568cf5cefc155dfa9aa79de72cedd9d089abc3d35a8f93f722a4db4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

manganese atom · pest · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Plant populations can be reduced by band placement of Mn in the row with seed under adverse moisture conditions.

    Correction of Mn Deficiency of Soybeans1 · 1978

    Opposite direction

See all 2 papers →

iron atom · pest · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Iron application caused no Fe toxicity in soybean.

    Influence of FeEDDHA on Iron–Manganese Interaction in Soybean Genotypes in a Calcareous Soil · 2002

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Seed applied Fe-EDDHA reduced plant population by 10.6% relative to no application.

    How Raised Beds and Fe-Chelate Affect Soybean Iron Deficiency Chlorosis and Yield · 2021 · compared with no application

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Increasing iron aggravated leaf ultrastructural damage in Zhechun No. 3.

    Effect of excessive Fe~(2+) on leaf cells ultrastructure of soybean · 2005

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Raising iron to 20 or 30 p.p.m. counteracted manganese toxicity.

    THE INFLUENCE OF IRON SUPPLY ON TOXIC EFFECTS OF MANGANESE, MOLYBDENUM AND VANADIUM ON SOYBEAN, PEAS AND FLAX · 1954

    Same direction

See all 5 papers →

zinc atom · pest · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
    Zn supplementation decreased ion toxicity in salt-affected soybean plants.

    Zinc Supplementation Enhances Glutathione-Mediated Antioxidant Defense and Glyoxalase Systems to Conferring Salt Tolerance in Soybean (Glycine max L.) · 2022

    Same direction

  2. positive
    Zinc and phosphorus treatment lowered Spodoptera fivoralis density relative to control and okadin alone.

    Effect of phosphorus and zinc on soybean susceptibility to insect infestation · 1998 · compared with control

    Same direction

See all 3 papers →

3 of 5 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.