Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Conventional tillage with straw increased maize yield by 8.3% versus conventional tillage.

A claim from Enhanced soil nutrient supply during the grain-filling stage alleviates microbial resource limitations and increases maize yield under straw incorporation · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with straw increased maize yield by 8.3% versus conventional tillage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
CTSe0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.3%e0
Comparator
CTe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CTS and DTS significantly increased maize yield by 8.3% and 17.6%, respectively, compared to CT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–832

Title

Enhanced soil nutrient supply during the grain-filling stage alleviates microbial resource limitations and increases maize yield under straw incorporation

Wei Yang; Wenxiu Zou; Juanjuan Qu; et al. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jia.2026.04.016

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-30afeeaf9dfcfa78aad6fd01359d37267237bd117658eb8bd6cbb10df520774d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

organic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 330 positive, 43 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this claim · 32 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

364 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.