Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Two hoe weedings at 3 and 6 WAS effectively controlled weeds.

A claim from Performance of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) under irrigation as influenced by weed management methods and intra row spacing · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hoe weedings at 3 and 6 WAS effectively controlled weeds.

Treatment
two hoe weeding at 3 and 6 WASe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
controlled weedse0
Direction
effectively controllede0
Setting
Samaru, Zaria and Kadawa, Kanoe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two hoe weeding at 3 and 6 WAS and 20 cm intra row spacing effectively controlled weeds and produced the highest grain yield (kg ha-1) in Samaru, Zaria and Kadawa, Kano”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1577
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–21

Title

Performance of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) under irrigation as influenced by weed management methods and intra row spacing

M. S. Na-Allah; A. A. Mukhtar; M. A. Mahadi; et al. Journal of Agricultural Science and Practice 2017. doi:10.31248/jasp2017.046

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-321f9765f72b64fefee9b1661e1db512afe74b25fc9b9068a97402a75a2da86a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

herbicide · weed · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 32 positive, 2 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.