Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Two hoe weedings at 3 and 6 WAS significantly increased cowpea height, canopy spread and growth rate.

A claim from Performance of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) under irrigation as influenced by weed management methods and intra row spacing · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hoe weedings at 3 and 6 WAS significantly increased cowpea height, canopy spread and growth rate.

Treatment
two hoe weeding at 3 and 6 WASe0
Outcome
plant height, canopy spread and crop growth ratee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two hoe weeding at 3 and 6 WAS resulted to significantly higher values for plant height, canopy spread and crop growth rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1152
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–21

Title

Performance of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) under irrigation as influenced by weed management methods and intra row spacing

M. S. Na-Allah; A. A. Mukhtar; M. A. Mahadi; et al. Journal of Agricultural Science and Practice 2017. doi:10.31248/jasp2017.046

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-8907b42bcdb6adc89f32974ceade6c163b23aaed26d9d8dd8bbc3e05fa7d4c44 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

herbicide · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.