Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Four prothioconazole sprayings gave 68–70% rust control.

A claim from Performance of prothioconazole solo or added to mancozeb in the control of Asian soybean rust · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four prothioconazole sprayings gave 68–70% rust control.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0e0e1
Treatment
four sprayings of prothioconazole alonet0e0e1
Outcome
controlt0e0e1
Value
68% to 70%t0e0e1
Comparator
unsprayed treatmentt0e0e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–88
e0

“Fifty-one to 61% control was obtained with three sprayings and 68% to 70% control with four sprayings of prothioconazole alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–950
e1

“control was calculated in relation to the unsprayed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–774

Title

Performance of prothioconazole solo or added to mancozeb in the control of Asian soybean rust

Erlei Melo Reis; Mateus Zanatta; Andrea Camargo Reis Summa Phytopathologica 2020. doi:10.1590/0100-5405/190162

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-3301e58e49cbb2bca0f6bdc8770fb3bf194a813c676d8a842f8178895eba29ba · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

prothioconazole · control · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 9 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.