Intervention effectmodel-written summary

All management systems controlled entireleaf and pitted morningglory, smooth pigweed and common cocklebur at least 92%.

A claim from Weed Management, Fiber Quality, and Net Returns in No-Tillage Transgenic and Nontransgenic Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)1 · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All management systems controlled entireleaf and pitted morningglory, smooth pigweed and common cocklebur at least 92%.

Treatment
all management systemse0
Interactor
smooth pigweedAmaranthus hybriduse0weed
Second interactor
common cocklebure0weed
Outcome
Entireleaf and pitted morningglory, smooth pigweed, and common cocklebure0
Direction
controllede0
Value
at least 92%e0
Qualifier
Entireleaf and pitted morningglorye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus hybridus
Amaranthus hybridus · InteractorUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Entireleaf and pitted morningglory, smooth pigweed, and common cocklebur were controlled at least 92% with all management systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–528
e1

“cotton cultivars in a no-tillage environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–146

Title

Weed Management, Fiber Quality, and Net Returns in No-Tillage Transgenic and Nontransgenic Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)1

WILLIAM A. BAILEY; JOHN W. WILCUT; ROBERT M. HAYES Weed Technology 2003. doi:10.1614/0890-037x(2003)017[0117:wmfqan]2.0.co;2

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-33ba0f11214544d666427c5da8e27242b357f5326958d6247f66af7e71138c99 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer