Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cotton lint yield and net returns were generally highest with bromoxynil or pyrithiobac POT followed by cyanazine plus MSMA LAYBY.

A claim from Weed Management, Fiber Quality, and Net Returns in No-Tillage Transgenic and Nontransgenic Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)1 · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton lint yield and net returns were generally highest with bromoxynil or pyrithiobac POT followed by cyanazine plus MSMA LAYBY.

Treatment
bromoxynil or pyrithiobac POT followed by cyanazine plus MSMA LAYBYe0
Outcome
lint yield and net returnse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton lint yield and net returns were generally highest in systems that included bromoxynil or pyrithiobac POT followed by cyanazine plus MSMA LAYBY or multiple glyphosate treatments where no LAYBY herbicides were used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1231

Title

Weed Management, Fiber Quality, and Net Returns in No-Tillage Transgenic and Nontransgenic Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)1

WILLIAM A. BAILEY; JOHN W. WILCUT; ROBERT M. HAYES Weed Technology 2003. doi:10.1614/0890-037x(2003)017[0117:wmfqan]2.0.co;2

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-4041c7d60a78bdcb08d045cee3426b4548e3af3afb6b797a65e28e7fa4ccae0c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

herbicide · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 10 positive, 17 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.