Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Mulching increased yam tuber yield relative to unmulched plots.

A claim from Effect of Planting and Mulching Materials on Growth and Yield of White Yam (Dioscorea rotundata) in Ikorodu, Lagos State, Nigeria · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased yam tuber yield relative to unmulched plots.

Treatment
mulchinge0
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
unmulched yame0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dioscorea cayenensis subsp. rotundata
Dioscorea cayenensis subsp. rotundata · TaxonDorcas Atule · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mulching significantly (P< 0.05) increased tuber yield than the unmulched yam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–814
e1

“growth and yield of white yam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–78

Title

Effect of Planting and Mulching Materials on Growth and Yield of White Yam (Dioscorea rotundata) in Ikorodu, Lagos State, Nigeria

Benson, G. A. S.; Oso, Y. O. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 2024. doi:10.9734/jeai/2024/v46i42346

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-35838eb3a9db01db91851297a47f4addcfdbb00e1c7f1a054cce6da51702e910 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

mulching · yield · Dioscorea cayenensis (yellow yam)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.