Claim · model-written summary
TH-802, LE-626, LE-1-2, Sonali Sel-1, WKT-2, WKT-3 and WKT-5 were susceptible to fruit borer.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Material
- TH-802, LE-626, LE-1-2, Sonali Sel-1, WKT-2, WKT-3 and WKT-5e0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=60)
Helicoverpa armigerat0pest - Outcome
- susceptible to fruit borere0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“TH-802, LE-626, LE-1-2, Sonali Sel-1, WKT-2, WKT-3 and WKT-5 were found to be susceptible to fruit borer”
t0“tomato cultivars against fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera”
Title
Screening of tomato cultivars against fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) infesting tomato
M Safna; Kumud V Naik; PB Sanap; et al. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2018
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation None of the tomato cultivars was free from fruit borer infestation.
- Observation Percent fruit infestation by the fruit borer ranged from 15.75 to 42.53 percent across cultivars.
- Observation Cultivar Arka Alok had the maximum mean fruit infestation, 42.53%.
- Observation Cultivar BT 105 had the minimum fruit infestation, 15.75%.
- Observation Cultivar BT-1 had the second lowest fruit infestation, 18.59%.
- Observation Arka Alok, Thrissur and BL-142 were highly susceptible to fruit borer.
- Observation BT-317, BT-105, BT-102-2-2-1, LE-415, SUN-7611, BMZ-21, Sonali, Arka Alok Sel-1, WKT-1, WKT-4 and WKT-6 were moderately susceptible.
- Observation None of the cultivars was resistant to the fruit borer.
- Recommendation Cultivar BT 105 was found to be the better cultivar against fruit borer.