Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The low amount of compost gave lower marketable yield than organic fertilizer in IA.

A claim from Optimizing Rowcover Deployment for Managing Bacterial Wilt and Using Compost for Organic Muskmelon Production · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The low amount of compost gave lower marketable yield than organic fertilizer in IA.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
low amount of composte1
Outcome
marketable yielde1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
the organic fertilizere1
Setting
IAe1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic muskmelon ( Cucumis melo var. reticulatus ) in Pennsylvania (PA), Iowa (IA), and Kentucky (KY) to manage bacterial wilt ( Erwinia tracheiphila )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–219
e1

“In IA, marketable yield was lower with the low amount of compost compared with the organic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1774–1875

Title

Optimizing Rowcover Deployment for Managing Bacterial Wilt and Using Compost for Organic Muskmelon Production

Elsa S. Sánchez; Ermita Hernández; Mark L. Gleason; et al. HortTechnology 2015. doi:10.21273/horttech.25.6.762

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-38bb10a2b3efebf54219130e78645e2f0619de752a10757a533b0241dc886675 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.