Paper · 2013 · Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture)

EFFECTS OF COVER CROP MANAGEMENT AND COMPOST APPLICATION ON SOIL FERTILITY OF ORGANIC MELON

Fabio Tittarelli; Gabriele Campanelli; Roberta Farina; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out in Central Italy on growing melon (Cucumis melo L.) after barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Three different systems of cover crop termination (green manure, roller crimper and fallow, as control) were combined with three doses of compost (0, 15 and 30 t ha-1 d.m.) in a strip plot design. The main objective of the research was to evaluate their effects on organic melon production and on short and long term soil nitrogen (N) fertility. Marketable yield and quality and soil N availability along the melon cycle were determined and a simplified N budget calculated. Green manure (GM) treatment showed the highest total and marketable yield, followed by fallow (FA), while roller crimper (RC) was characterized by a significant lower yield respect to the other two treatments (45% and 62% of the marketable yield of GM and FA, respectively). On the other side, long term soil N fertility of GM and FA were characterized by N deficit unless combined with compost application at the dose of 15 t ha-1 d.m.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure gave the highest total and marketable melon yield, followed by fallow.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Green manure (GM)e0
Outcome
total and marketable yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
fallow (FA)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green manure (GM) treatment showed the highest total and marketable yield, followed by fallow (FA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–695 · show in text ↑
t0

“MELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Roller crimper marketable yield was 45% of green manure yield.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
roller crimper (RC)e0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
45%e0
Comparator
GMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“roller crimper (RC) was characterized by a significant lower yield respect to the other two treatments (45% and 62% of the marketable yield of GM and FA, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“MELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Roller crimper marketable yield was 62% of fallow yield.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
roller crimper (RC)e0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
62%e0
Comparator
FAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“roller crimper (RC) was characterized by a significant lower yield respect to the other two treatments (45% and 62% of the marketable yield of GM and FA, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“MELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure led to a long-term soil nitrogen deficit without sufficient compost.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
GMe0
Outcome
soil N fertilitye0
Direction
N deficite0
Comparator
compost application at the dose of 15 t ha-1 d.m.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“long term soil N fertility of GM and FA were characterized by N deficit unless combined with compost application at the dose of 15 t ha-1 d.m.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“MELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fallow led to a long-term soil nitrogen deficit without sufficient compost.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
FAe0
Outcome
soil N fertilitye0
Direction
N deficite0
Comparator
compost application at the dose of 15 t ha-1 d.m.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“long term soil N fertility of GM and FA were characterized by N deficit unless combined with compost application at the dose of 15 t ha-1 d.m.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“MELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.