Claim · model-written summary
The soybean rotation yield advantage declined as spring rainfall rose.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe1 - Outcome
- soybean yield advantage from crop rotatione0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Setting
- 1 April to 31 May rainfalle0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The soybean yield advantage from crop rotation decreased as 1 April to 31 May rainfall increased.”
e1“Soybean”
Title
Yield‐Soil Water Relationships in Sorghum‐Soybean Cropping Systems with Different Fertilizer Regimes
W. Roder; S. C. Mason; M. D. Clegg; et al. Agronomy Journal 1989. doi:10.2134/agronj1989.00021962008100030015x
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Fertilizer treatment did not affect soil water content.
- Intervention effect Upper soil water content was greatest under continuous sorghum.
- Intervention effect Upper soil water content was least under continuous soybean.
- Observation Soybean depleted 10 to 36 mm more soil water than sorghum to 120 cm in September.
- Intervention effect Rotation increased soybean yield.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen application did not increase soybean yield.
- Intervention effect Manure reduced soybean yield in 1986.
- Intervention effect Manure had no effect on soybean yield in other years.
- Intervention effect Rotation increased sorghum grain yield.
- Intervention effect Fertilization increased sorghum grain yield.