Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sorghum grain yield was least at 3.48 Mg ha −1 with reduced tillage after each crop.

A claim from Tillage Effects on Dryland Wheat and Sorghum Production in the Southern Great Plains · 1994

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum grain yield was least at 3.48 Mg ha −1 with reduced tillage after each crop.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
reduced tillage after each crope0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
leaste0
Value
3.48 Mg ha −1e0
Comparator
reduced tillage after sorghum and no‐tillage after wheate0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean sorghum grain yield was greatest (3.91 Mg ha −1 ) for the system of reduced tillage after sorghum and no‐tillage after wheat, and least (3.48 Mg ha −1 ) for the system of reduced tillage after each crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1147

Title

Tillage Effects on Dryland Wheat and Sorghum Production in the Southern Great Plains

Paul W. Unger Agronomy Journal 1994. doi:10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600020019x

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-3a062fcabd58639df2f646745e9507931010caab1ef0346f5bb52ce1dd474e6c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · SorghumResults differ

123 papers: 102 positive, 21 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim · 101 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

114 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.