Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Little millet with groundnut in the 2:1, 2:2 and 4:1 row ratios gave higher net return to Rs investments (Rs 1.27-1.49) than sole little millet.

A claim from Sustainable intercrop association of little millet (Panicum miliare) with groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) and pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Little millet with groundnut in the 2:1, 2:2 and 4:1 row ratios gave higher net return to Rs investments (Rs 1.27-1.49) than sole little millet.

Taxon
little millett0
Treatment
little millet with groundnut in 2 :!, 2 :2 and 4 : 1 row ratiose2
Outcome
net return to RslRe investmentse2
Direction
highere2
Value
Rs 1.27-1.49e2
Comparator
sole little millete2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“little millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50
e2

“associztion of little millet with groundnut in 2 :!, 2 :2 and 4 : 1 row ratios were found more remunerative, which gave higher monetary advantage of Rs 320llia and Rs 4891 ha respectively than sole little millet. These treatments also accounted for higher nct return (212%232%), net return to RslRe investments (Rs 1.27-1.49), net returnlday (Rs 16.72- 1 8.31) and finally relative net return (Rs 1.59-1.70) over sole little millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–972

Title

Sustainable intercrop association of little millet (Panicum miliare) with groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) and pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan)

S. AHMAD; N. K. PRASAD Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v41i3.3667

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-3a431895dc665d418a498e1b77ac97195deecb2d182218a9e1f9db2c7bf35693 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer