Claim · model-written summary
The 4:1 row ratio in little millet intercropping had a product of crowding coefficient of K 25.43.
- Taxon
- little millett0
- Treatment
- Row ratio of 4:le3
- Outcome
- product of crowding coefficiente3
- Value
- K 25.43e3
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Verbatim
t0“little millet”
e3“Row ratio of 4:l also accounted for maximum land-equivalent ratio (1.26) and product of crowding coefficient (K 25.43)”
Title
S. AHMAD; N. K. PRASAD Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v41i3.3667
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Intercropping groundnut or pigeonpea with little millet was beneficial to sole-stand yield of little millet.
- Intervention effect Intercropping groundnut or pigeonpea with little millet was uneconomical for the sole-stand yield of both intercrops.
- Intervention effect Little millet with groundnut in 2:1, 2:2 and 4:1 row ratios gave higher monetary advantage than sole little millet (Rs 320 and Rs 4891 per hectare).
- Intervention effect Little millet with groundnut in the 2:1, 2:2 and 4:1 row ratios gave higher net return (212%-232%) than sole little millet.
- Intervention effect Little millet with groundnut in the 2:1, 2:2 and 4:1 row ratios gave higher net return to Rs investments (Rs 1.27-1.49) than sole little millet.
- Intervention effect Little millet with groundnut in the 2:1, 2:2 and 4:1 row ratios gave higher net return per day (Rs 16.72-18.31) than sole little millet.
- Intervention effect Little millet with groundnut in the 2:1, 2:2 and 4:1 row ratios gave higher relative net return (Rs 1.59-1.70) than sole little millet.
- Intervention effect The 4:1 row ratio gave the maximum land-equivalent ratio (1.26) in little millet intercropping.