Claim · model-written summary
Mating disruption alone, with or without limited azinphos-methyl or fenoxycarb, did not give commercially acceptable control except in low density populations.
- Taxon
- Cydia pomonella
Cydia pomonellae1 - Treatment
- mating disruption alonee1
- Outcome
- commercially acceptable levels of controle3
- Qualifier
- in other than low density populationse3
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Mating disruption alone and mating disruption supplemented with limited applications of either azinphos‐methyl or fenoxycarb was evaluated in 0.11–0.30 ha plots for the control of codling moth Cydia pomonella (L.) (Tortricidae: Olethreutinae) populations”
e3“Neither mating disruption alone nor when supplemented with azinphos‐methyl or fenoxycarb during the first spring generation gave commercially acceptable levels of control in other than low density populations”
Title
Control of codling moth in small plots by mating disruption: alone and with limited insecticide
R. A. Vickers; W. G. Thwaite; D. G. Williams; et al. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 1998. doi:10.1046/j.1570-7458.1998.00285.x
Other claims from this paper (3)
- Intervention effect Where codling moth populations were low, mating disruption alone kept damage below 1% at harvest.
- Intervention effect Drift of azinphos-methyl from border areas gave excellent codling moth control in the first year at the high density site.
- Mechanism Low dosages of insecticide and pheromone treatments appear to interact so that the insecticide enhances the disruptive effect of pheromone.