Cydia pomonella 6 claims

Claim · model-written summary

In mulched field plots, S. carpocapsae-infected cadavers followed by wood flour foam produced 56% larval mortality.

Taxon

codling mothCydia pomonellat0

Treatment

formulated S. carpocapsaee0

Interactor

S. carpocapsaeSteinernema carpocapsaee0biocontrol_agent

Outcome

mortalitye0

Value

56e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Mulched field plots treated with formulated S. carpocapsae- or S. feltiae-infected G. mellonella larvae, then followed by an application of wood flour foam as an anti-desiccant, resulted in 56 and 86% mortality, respectively”

t0

“codling moth larvae”

Claim · model-written summary

In mulched field plots, S. feltiae-infected cadavers followed by wood flour foam produced 86% larval mortality.

Taxon

codling mothCydia pomonellat0

Treatment

S. feltiae-infected G. mellonella larvaee0

Interactor

S. feltiaeSteinernema feltiaee0biocontrol_agent

Outcome

mortalitye0

Value

86%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Mulched field plots treated with formulated S. carpocapsae- or S. feltiae-infected G. mellonella larvae, then followed by an application of wood flour foam as an anti-desiccant, resulted in 56 and 86% mortality, respectively”

t0

“codling moth larvae”

Claim · model-written summary

Where codling moth populations were low, mating disruption alone kept damage below 1% at harvest.

Taxon

Cydia pomonellaCydia pomonellae1

Treatment

mating disruption alonee1

Outcome

codling moth damage levelse2

Direction

belowe2

Value

1%e2

Qualifier

Where populations were lowe2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Mating disruption alone and mating disruption supplemented with limited applications of either azinphos‐methyl or fenoxycarb was evaluated in 0.11–0.30 ha plots for the control of codling moth Cydia pomonella (L.) (Tortricidae: Olethreutinae) populations”

e2

“Where populations were low, mating disruption alone was sufficient to keep codling moth damage levels below 1% at harvest”

Claim · model-written summary

Mating disruption alone, with or without limited azinphos-methyl or fenoxycarb, did not give commercially acceptable control except in low density populations.

Taxon

Cydia pomonellaCydia pomonellae1

Treatment

mating disruption alonee1

Outcome

commercially acceptable levels of controle3

Qualifier

in other than low density populationse3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1

“Mating disruption alone and mating disruption supplemented with limited applications of either azinphos‐methyl or fenoxycarb was evaluated in 0.11–0.30 ha plots for the control of codling moth Cydia pomonella (L.) (Tortricidae: Olethreutinae) populations”

e3

“Neither mating disruption alone nor when supplemented with azinphos‐methyl or fenoxycarb during the first spring generation gave commercially acceptable levels of control in other than low density populations”

Claim · model-written summary

Drift of azinphos-methyl from border areas gave excellent codling moth control in the first year at the high density site.

Taxon

Cydia pomonellaCydia pomonellae1

Treatment

drift of azinphos‐methyl from border arease4

Outcome

controle4

Qualifier

in the first yeare4

Setting

high density sitee4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1

“Mating disruption alone and mating disruption supplemented with limited applications of either azinphos‐methyl or fenoxycarb was evaluated in 0.11–0.30 ha plots for the control of codling moth Cydia pomonella (L.) (Tortricidae: Olethreutinae) populations”

e4

“At the high density site unintentional supplementary control provided by drift of azinphos‐methyl from border areas to which it was applied throughout the season gave excellent control in the first year”

Claim · model-written summary

Low dosages of insecticide and pheromone treatments appear to interact so that the insecticide enhances the disruptive effect of pheromone.

Taxon

Cydia pomonellaCydia pomonellae1

Treatment

low dosages of insecticidee5

Outcome

disruptive effecte5

Verbatim

e1

“Mating disruption alone and mating disruption supplemented with limited applications of either azinphos‐methyl or fenoxycarb was evaluated in 0.11–0.30 ha plots for the control of codling moth Cydia pomonella (L.) (Tortricidae: Olethreutinae) populations”

e5

“suggested an interaction between low dosages of insecticide and pheromone treatments that enhanced the disruptive effect of the latter”