Claim · model-written summary
Benefit cost ratio was 1.56.
- Taxon
- carrot
Daucus carotat0 - Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe0
- Value
- 1.56e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“benefit cost ratio were 234 hours, 2.21 years and 1.56, respectively”
t0“carrot”
Title
Performance evaluation of single row tractor operated carrot digger
Agricultural Engineering Today 2020. doi:10.52151/aet2020444.1524
Other claims from this paper (16)
- Method / resource Optimal blade angle was 21°.
- Method / resource Optimal conveyor angle was reported as 250.
- Method / resource Optimal shoot catch height was 2 cm.
- Method / resource Digger field capacity was 0.11 ha h-1.
- Method / resource Field efficiency was 61.70 %.
- Method / resource Digging efficiency was 100%.
- Method / resource Cut carrots were 0.62%.
- Method / resource Bruised carrots were 0.90%.
- Method / resource Picking efficiency was 62.29%.
- Method / resource De-topping cutting efficiency was 100%.
- Method / resource Digger harvesting required 27 man-h ha-1 versus 450 manually.
- Method / resource Digger operational cost was Rs. 8242 ha-1.
- Method / resource The digger saved time and cost compared with manual harvesting.
- Method / resource Break-even point was 234 hours.
- Method / resource Payback period was 2.21 years.
- Method / resource The digger worked better for single-row ridge sowing than broadcasting.