Intervention effectmodel-written summary

EC caused greater wheat stunting than WG.

A claim from Winter Annual Broadleaf Weeds and Winter Wheat Response to Postemergence Application of Two Saflufenacil Formulations · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EC caused greater wheat stunting than WG.

Treatment
Saflufenacil ECe0
Outcome
stuntinge0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
saflufenacil WGe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Saflufenacil EC consistently caused greater foliar necrosis and stunting on wheat than saflufenacil WG”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1423

Title

Winter Annual Broadleaf Weeds and Winter Wheat Response to Postemergence Application of Two Saflufenacil Formulations

John C. Frihauf; Phillip W. Stahlman; Patrick W. Geier; et al. Weed Technology 2010. doi:10.1614/wt-d-09-00049.1

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-3bb3fa54388e303b99ae412e246453a166bb1851b72a156e7c1e7b827dfc5f84 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

saflufenacil · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.