Intervention effectmodel-written summary

IBA in sand produced rooting percentage of 90%.

A claim from De novo adventitious root formations in mini-cuttings of Azadirachta indica in response to different rooting media and auxin treatments · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA in sand produced rooting percentage of 90%.

Taxon
Azadirachta indicaAzadirachta indicat0
Treatment
IBAe0
Outcome
rooting percentagee0
Direction
highere0
Value
90%e0
Setting
sande0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azadirachta indica
Azadirachta indica · TaxonVinayaraj · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IBA resulted in higher rooting percentage (90%), number of roots (149.56), root length (14.83 cm) and number of leaves per rooted mini-cuttings (12.78), when growing in sand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1122
t0

“De novo adventitious root formations in mini-cuttings of Azadirachta indica in response to different rooting media and auxin treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–135

Title

De novo adventitious root formations in mini-cuttings of Azadirachta indica in response to different rooting media and auxin treatments

A Gehlot; RK Gupta; ID Arya; et al. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry 2014. doi:10.3832/ifor1189-007

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-3bdb03b8984ad337c7d6647718c1301ee542b2165ce8e38c59a6a8e84ea6c3a9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Azadirachta indica (neem)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.