Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Silencing SlMKK2 or SlMKK4 increased reactive oxygen species accumulation in tomato after B. cinerea infection

A claim from Tomato SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 contribute to disease resistance against Botrytis cinerea · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silencing SlMKK2 or SlMKK4 increased reactive oxygen species accumulation in tomato after B. cinerea infection

Treatment
Silencing of SlMKK2 or SlMKK4e1
Outcome
accumulation of reactive oxygen speciese1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Silencing of SlMKK2 or SlMKK4 resulted in reduced resistance to B. cinerea, increased accumulation of reactive oxygen species and attenuated expression of defense genes after infection of B. cinerea in tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1100
e2

“in tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1100

Title

Tomato SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 contribute to disease resistance against Botrytis cinerea

Xiaohui Li; Yafen Zhang; Lei Huang; et al. BMC Plant Biology 2014. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-14-166

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-3ce204ee90d764cc9741f8e628ec2b0a416cd594354228de6a51bea2177a1dd2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

loss of function · physiology: oxidative · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 3 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Silencing of SlSAP4 increased reactive oxygen species accumulation in tomato.

    Tomato Stress-Associated Protein 4 Contributes Positively to Immunity Against Necrotrophic Fungus Botrytis cinerea · 2018

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. negative
    Silencing selected SlTPS genes disrupted ROS accumulation after infection.

    Virus-Induced Gene Silencing-Based Functional Analyses Revealed the Involvement of Several Putative Trehalose-6-Phosphate Synthase/Phosphatase Genes in Disease Resistance against Botrytis cinerea and Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 in Tomato · 2016

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. positive
    Silencing both genes promoted Xoc-induced H2O2.

    SlCNGC1 and SlCNGC14 Suppress Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola-Induced Hypersensitive Response and Non-host Resistance in Tomato · 2018

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Silencing Sly-miR171d delayed increased electrolyte leakage in tomato fruit.

    Silencing of Sly-miR171d increased the expression of GRAS24 and enhanced postharvest chilling tolerance of tomato fruit · 2022

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    RipU NVS mutation impaired ROS suppression and cell death induction, and only partly restored bacterial replication in tomato.

    Ralstonia solanacearum Acetyltransferase RipU Hijacks SlJAR1 to Inhibit Jasmonic Acid Signalling and Facilitate Pathogen Infection · 2026

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Silencing of RBOH1 compromised BR-induced apoplastic H2O2 production, ABA accumulation and PQ stress responses in tomato.

    H2O2 mediates the crosstalk of brassinosteroid and abscisic acid in tomato responses to heat and oxidative stresses · 2014

    Same direction

  7. negative
    BZR1 mutation impaired apoplastic H2O2 production.

    BZR1 Transcription Factor Regulates Heat Stress Tolerance Through FERONIA Receptor-Like Kinase-Mediated Reactive Oxygen Species Signaling in Tomato · 2018

    Same direction

  8. negative
    RBOH1 silencing inhibited MPK1/2 activation and H2 O2 accumulation.

    Silencing of tomato RBOH1 and MPK2 abolishes brassinosteroid‐induced H2O2 generation and stress tolerance · 2012

    Same direction

24 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.