Claim · model-written summary
Compound 2 had no activity against L. sativa.
- Taxon
- L. sativa
Lactuca sativae0 - Treatment
- Compound 2e0
- Outcome
- activity against L. sativae0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compound 2 had no activity against L. sativa”
Title
Debora Luiza Costa Barreto; Charles L Cantrell; Amber Callahan Reichley; et al. Pest Management Science 2026. doi:10.1002/ps.70803
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Grammicin inhibited Lactuca sativa seed germination by 100% at 1 mg mL −1.
- Intervention effect Grammicin inhibited Agrostis stolonifera seed germination by 100% at 1 mg mL −1.
- Intervention effect Compound 2 inhibited A. stolonifera seed germination at 1 mg mL −1.
- Intervention effect Grammicin inhibited Lemna paucicostata growth by 50% at 87.7 μM.
- Intervention effect Compound 2 had no activity against Lemna paucicostata.
- Observation Neither compound had antifungal activity against Colletotrichum fragariae.
- Method / resource Molecular modeling predicted grammicin to be a strong PSII inhibitor.
- Observation In vivo testing found grammicin a very weak PSII inhibitor.