Claim · model-written summary
RE-40885 did not injure peanut at any tested rate or application time.
- Taxon
- Peanuts
Arachis hypogaeae3 - Treatment
- RE-40885e3
- Outcome
- injurede3
- Qualifier
- at any of the evaluated rates or application timese3
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“evaluated for weed control in peanuts (Arachis hypogea L.)”
e3“Peanuts were not injured by RE-40885 at any of the evaluated rates or application times”
Title
Peanut Weed Control Systems Utilizing RE-408851
T. C. Mueller; P. A. Banks Peanut Science 1989. doi:10.3146/i0095-3679-16-2-7
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect RE-40885 applied to soil or foliage gave excellent control of Florida beggarweed and prickly sida in peanut at 0.56 to 1.12 kg ai/ha.
- Intervention effect RE-40885 treatments did not adequately control Texas panicum in peanut.
- Intervention effect Early postemergence RE-40885 plus 2,4-DB improved sicklepod control at 8 weeks after planting compared with either herbicide alone.
- Intervention effect Sequential RE-40885 applications were needed to achieve more than 90% sicklepod control in peanut.
- Intervention effect RE-40885 plus alachlor applied at peanut emergence improved morningglory control 8 weeks after planting compared with either applied alone.
- Intervention effect RE-40885 plus alachlor applied at peanut emergence increased peanut yield compared with either applied alone.
- Intervention effect All treatments containing RE-40885 gave peanut yields significantly better than nontreated weedy control plots.