Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Residual soybean herbicide did not affect A. trifida density.

A claim from The effects of cereal rye cover crop seeding rate, termination timing, and herbicide inputs on weed control and soybean yield · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual soybean herbicide did not affect A. trifida density.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Residual soybean herbicidee0
Interactor
A. trifidaAmbrosia trifidae0weed
Outcome
density of A. trifidae0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ambrosia trifida
Ambrosia trifida · InteractorLe.Loup.Gris · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residual soybean herbicide use did not affect density of A. trifida .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1552

Title

The effects of cereal rye cover crop seeding rate, termination timing, and herbicide inputs on weed control and soybean yield

Alyssa I. Essman; Mark M. Loux; Alexander J. Lindsey; et al. Weed Science 2023. doi:10.1017/wsc.2023.33

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-3e6401aee2cddcecba63f0b5dc568959782a5ed78076ce13e2e68e451c55b7c5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

herbicide · Ambrosia trifida · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.