Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Elevated CO2 maintained higher turf quality, leaf water content and membrane stability in tall fescue under drought.

A claim from Responses to elevated carbon dioxide for postdrought recovery of turfgrass species differing in growth characteristics · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 maintained higher turf quality, leaf water content and membrane stability in tall fescue under drought.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceumt0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
turf quality, leaf water content, and membrane stabilitye0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
During drought stresse0
Comparator
ambient CO 2e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During drought stress, both species exposed to elevated CO 2 maintained higher turf quality, leaf water content, and membrane stability than plants at ambient CO 2 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1022
t0

“tall fescue [ Schedonorus arundinaceus (Schreb.) Dumort]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–573

Title

Responses to elevated carbon dioxide for postdrought recovery of turfgrass species differing in growth characteristics

Cathryn Chapman; Patrick Burgess; Bingru Huang Crop Science 2021. doi:10.1002/csc2.20622

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-3e7f40887d0ae36b21b6334f5792409a6324188554dbfb0b7cdaa765299d00cd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

co2 · physiology: water · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.