Claim · model-written summary
Each flooding day reduced cane yield in 2002.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Material
- CP 95‐1376e0
- Treatment
- Each day of floodinge0
- Outcome
- canee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 0.21e0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier
Verbatim
e0“Each day of flooding reduced cane and sugar yields of CP 95‐1376 by 0.17 and 0.02 kg m −2 , respectively, in 2000 and by 0.21 and 0.03 kg m −2 , respectively, in 2002”
t0“Sugarcane”
Title
Periodic Flooding and Water Table Effects on Two Sugarcane Genotypes
Barry Glaz; Dolen R. Morris; Samira H. Daroub Agronomy Journal 2004. doi:10.2134/agronj2004.0832
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect CP 95‐1429 yield did not respond to flooding or water table.
- Intervention effect Lowering the water table raised CP 95‐1376 cane yield in 2000.
- Intervention effect Lowering the water table raised CP 95‐1376 sugar yield in 2000.
- Intervention effect Lowering the water table raised cane yield in 2001.
- Intervention effect Lowering the water table raised sugar yield in 2001.
- Intervention effect Drainage water table depth did not affect CP 95‐1376 yield in 2002.
- Intervention effect Each flooding day reduced cane yield in 2000.
- Intervention effect Each flooding day reduced sugar yield in 2000.
- Intervention effect Each flooding day reduced sugar yield in 2002.
- Mechanism Authors attribute CP 95‐1429 flood tolerance to preexisting stalk aerenchyma.
- Recommendation Authors suggest such genotypes tolerate at least one week of flooding.