Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Each flooding day reduced sugar yield in 2000.

A claim from Periodic Flooding and Water Table Effects on Two Sugarcane Genotypes · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each flooding day reduced sugar yield in 2000.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
CP 95‐1376e0
Treatment
Each day of floodinge0
Outcome
sugar yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
0.02 kg m −2e0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Each day of flooding reduced cane and sugar yields of CP 95‐1376 by 0.17 and 0.02 kg m −2 , respectively, in 2000”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1309
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58

Title

Periodic Flooding and Water Table Effects on Two Sugarcane Genotypes

Barry Glaz; Dolen R. Morris; Samira H. Daroub Agronomy Journal 2004. doi:10.2134/agronj2004.0832

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-65bbdc4eb9bc95c50c56cb6e65b704d79881012564d7aab0b5f82831ecbb969d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

flooding · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. negative
  7. no effect
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.