Intervention effectmodel-written summary

number of tillers increased by 45.65 under waterlogging.

A claim from Morpho-physiological responses of sugarcane crop under waterlogging condition · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

number of tillers increased by 45.65 under waterlogging.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
waterloggingt0
Outcome
number of tillerse0
Direction
increasedbye0
Value
45.65e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Morphological parameters viz., plant height, number of internodes, number of tillers, stalk diameter, number of nodes and nodes carrying roots increasedby 18.46, 34.6, 45.65, 48.14, 3 2.14 and 52.63%, respectively, over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–454
t0

“Morpho-physiological responses of sugarcane crop under waterlogging condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77

Title

Morpho-physiological responses of sugarcane crop under waterlogging condition

R. Anitha; P. Christy Nirmala Mary; R. S. Purushothaman Research on Crops 2016. doi:10.5958/2348-7542.2016.00062.0

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-53c67908d7cd4c0e207c8ebf25465903bd22fca1365d9f4ae68a1c365f798e56 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

flooding · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    CP 95‐1429 yield did not respond to flooding or water table.

    Periodic Flooding and Water Table Effects on Two Sugarcane Genotypes · 2004

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Intermittent flooding cycles did not decrease sugarcane yields.

    Sugarcane Response to High Water Tables and Intermittent Flooding · 2009

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Flooding reduced cane yield.

    Flooding tolerance of sugarcane genotypes under recurring floods in plant and ratoon crops · 2024

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Soil waterlogging caused no major losses in sugarcane plant development and productivity compared with the control.

    Does the tolerance of sugarcane to excess water in the soil depend on the stage of development? · 2019 · compared with the control (irrigation without flooding the soil)

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Periodic flooding increased plant-crop cane and sucrose yield.

    Sugarcane Response to Water Table, Periodic Flood, and Foliar Nitrogen on Organic Soil · 2006

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Flooded sugarcane had sucrose yields at least as high as non-flooded controls.

    Sugarcane Response to Month and Duration of Preharvest Flood · 2007 · compared with non-flooded controls

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Clone C 16338 showed the least drop in cane yield compared with Co 86032 under waterlogging stress at the peak growth stage.

    Impact of waterlogging stress on the yield of specific sugarcane genotypes yields in the northeastern coastal region of Tamil Nadu · 2025 · compared with Co 86032

    Same direction

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.