Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Flooding reduced cane yield.

A claim from Flooding tolerance of sugarcane genotypes under recurring floods in plant and ratoon crops · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding reduced cane yield.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Floodinge0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–31
e0

“Flooding reduced cane yield and commercial cane sugar (CCS) yield, as well as the percentage of polarization (POL), purity, and CCS in sugarcane juice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–453

Title

Flooding tolerance of sugarcane genotypes under recurring floods in plant and ratoon crops

Nongluk Teinseree; Pitchatorn Maitreemitr; Hugo Alfried Volkaert; et al. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 2024. doi:10.1590/1984-70332024v24n2a15

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-577ee410d051139d859cc35319db2efe50d6b66a929bf38ce2db7b7a25e32321 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

flooding · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Periodic flooding increased plant-crop cane and sucrose yield.

    Sugarcane Response to Water Table, Periodic Flood, and Foliar Nitrogen on Organic Soil · 2006

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Flooded sugarcane had sucrose yields at least as high as non-flooded controls.

    Sugarcane Response to Month and Duration of Preharvest Flood · 2007 · compared with non-flooded controls

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    number of tillers increased by 45.65 under waterlogging.

    Morpho-physiological responses of sugarcane crop under waterlogging condition · 2016 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Clone C 16338 showed the least drop in cane yield compared with Co 86032 under waterlogging stress at the peak growth stage.

    Impact of waterlogging stress on the yield of specific sugarcane genotypes yields in the northeastern coastal region of Tamil Nadu · 2025 · compared with Co 86032

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    CP 95‐1429 yield did not respond to flooding or water table.

    Periodic Flooding and Water Table Effects on Two Sugarcane Genotypes · 2004

    Same direction

  6. no effect
    Intermittent flooding cycles did not decrease sugarcane yields.

    Sugarcane Response to High Water Tables and Intermittent Flooding · 2009

    Same direction

  7. no effect
    Soil waterlogging caused no major losses in sugarcane plant development and productivity compared with the control.

    Does the tolerance of sugarcane to excess water in the soil depend on the stage of development? · 2019 · compared with the control (irrigation without flooding the soil)

    Same direction

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.