Claim · model-written summary
Begonia open flower count was smallest under MC.
- Taxon
- Begonia xhiemalis
Begonia ×hiemalist0 - Treatment
- MCe0
- Outcome
- cumulative number of open flowerse0
- Direction
- smalleste0
- Value
- 58.5e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The cumulative number of open flowers was largest (91.8) under FL bulb + HL and smallest (58.5) under MC.”
t0“Begonia xhiemalis”
Title
Wook Oh; In Sook Park; Tae Jo Lim; et al. Journal of People Plants and Environment 2012. doi:10.11628/ksppe.2012.15.6.465
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect Begonia height, width and leaf number did not significantly differ among light sources.
- Intervention effect Begonia chlorophyll content was higher under FL tube plus LED bulb.
- Intervention effect Begonia chlorophyll content was lower under HPS.
- Intervention effect Begonia open flower count was largest under FL bulb plus HL.
- Intervention effect Begonia flower diameter was largest under MH.
- Intervention effect Begonia flower diameter was smallest under MC.
- Intervention effect Begonia fresh and dry weight were largest under MH.
- Intervention effect Pelargonium height was longest under HPS.
- Intervention effect Pelargonium width did not significantly differ among light sources.
- Intervention effect Pelargonium chlorophyll content was highest under FL tube plus LED bulb.
- Intervention effect Pelargonium open flower count differed significantly between MH and FL tube plus bulb.
- Intervention effect Pelargonium flower diameter and fresh weight did not differ among sources.
- Intervention effect Pelargonium dry weight was greatest under MH.