Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soil inoculum concentration did not significantly change tuber infection incidence or severity at maturity.

A claim from Effect of soil inoculum level and environmental factors on potato powdery scab caused by Spongospora subterranea · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil inoculum concentration did not significantly change tuber infection incidence or severity at maturity.

Treatment
Soil inoculum concentration of S. subterraneae0
Interactor
S. subterraneaSpongospora subterraneae0pathogen
Outcome
incidence and severity of either tuber infectione0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spongospora subterranea
Spongospora subterranea · InteractorA.J.Gevens · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil inoculum concentration of S. subterranea did not significantly affect the incidence and severity of either tuber infection or powdery scab symptoms at maturity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–715
t0

“potato powdery scab caused by Spongospora subterranea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–112

Title

Effect of soil inoculum level and environmental factors on potato powdery scab caused by Spongospora subterranea

P. Van De Graaf; A. K. Lees; S. J. Wale; et al. Plant Pathology 2005. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3059.2005.01111.x

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-43f48b2c9dcc1a9673b32acb5a3e83a4df0686d562df489c06bf5f83eb223384 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

inoculation · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

113 papers: 53 positive, 60 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this claim · 53 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

104 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.