Claim · model-written summary
Tillering-stage scarcity reduced GWP by 27.1% against flooding.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- water-scarce conditionse0
- Outcome
- GWPe0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 27.1%e0
- Qualifier
- tilleringe0
- Comparator
- continuous floodinge0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“GWP), were lower under water-scarce conditions than under continuous flooding, with reductions of 27.1%, 43.0%, and 58.1% during tillering, reproductive, and both stages, respectively.”
t0“rice”
Title
Patikorn Sriphirom; Rattapon Onchang; Benjamas Rossopa; et al. Crop and Environment 2024. doi:10.1016/j.crope.2024.12.005
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect Water scarcity reduced methane emissions significantly.
- Intervention effect Water scarcity increased nitrous oxide emissions via enhanced nitrification.
- Intervention effect Reproductive-stage scarcity reduced GWP by 43.0% against flooding.
- Intervention effect Scarcity at both stages reduced GWP by 58.1% against flooding.
- Intervention effect Tillering-stage scarcity maintained rice yield.
- Intervention effect Reproductive-stage scarcity significantly reduced rice yield.
- Intervention effect Biochar further mitigated greenhouse gas emissions.
- Intervention effect Biochar improved rice yield by 12.2%.
- Intervention effect Biochar increased soil pH, nutrient availability and soil organic carbon sequestration.
- Intervention effect Biochar suppressed methanogenesis and reduced nitrous oxide formation.
- Intervention effect Biochar improved nutrient use efficiency.
- Recommendation Authors recommend tillering-stage water scarcity with biochar.
- Recommendation In resource-limited settings, authors recommend prioritizing tillering scarcity over biochar.