Intervention effectmodel-written summary

High-dilution sulphur sprays did not reduce the severity of downy mildew on onion compared with untreated control.

A claim from High dilutions of Sulphur and relationship with the onion thrips, downy mildew incidence and yield of onion in organic system · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-dilution sulphur sprays did not reduce the severity of downy mildew on onion compared with untreated control.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
foliar sprays of 0.5% Sulphur at high dilutions 6, 12 and 30 CHe1
Interactor
downy mildewPeronosporaceaee2pathogen
Outcome
reduction of the severity of downy mildewe2
Direction
not influencede2
Comparator
untreated plote1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluate high dilutions of Sulphur on the incidence of onion thrips, downy mildew, chlorophyll content and yield of onion under organic production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–191
e1

“Treatments were foliar sprays of 0.5% Sulphur at high dilutions 6, 12 and 30 CH (CH, hahnemannian centesimal scale) and untreated plot as control check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–492
e2

“The incidence and damage of onion thrips, reduction of the severity of downy mildew, chlorophyll index, total and commercial yield, bulb weight, postharvest conservation were not influenced by the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–779

Title

High dilutions of Sulphur and relationship with the onion thrips, downy mildew incidence and yield of onion in organic system

Paulo Antonio de Souza Gonçalves; Pedro Boff; Francisco Olmar Gervini de Menezes Jr.; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2015

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-458d7a17cfb2c2b4305c872a4a806815c2969f9144e39053f4a039aaa08287a5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

application · Peronosporaceae · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.