Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nitrogen-by-humic-acid interactions significantly affected root and sugar yields, sucrose and proline.

A claim from IMPACT OF HUMIC ACID AND MINERAL NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON SOIL CHEMICAL PROPERTIES AND YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET UNDER SALINE SOIL. · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen-by-humic-acid interactions significantly affected root and sugar yields, sucrose and proline.

Treatment
mineral nitrogen fertilizer rates and humic acid (NXH)e0
Outcome
root and sugar yields, sucrose%, and proline concentratione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between mineral nitrogen fertilizer rates and humic acid (NXH) had a significant effect on root and sugar yields, sucrose%, and proline concentration in both seasons as will as on available K in the soil in the 1st season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1984–2222
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–119

Title

IMPACT OF HUMIC ACID AND MINERAL NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON SOIL CHEMICAL PROPERTIES AND YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET UNDER SALINE SOIL.

KH. A. H. Shaban; Eman M. Abdel Fatah; Dalia A. Syed Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2014. doi:10.21608/jssae.2014.49752

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-46825c8de4e7d1402b65015a7dac4ceac420003e22358b70ebab219f7e89eb7d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 17 in the model’s answer

fertilization · physiology: osmolytes · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

other · physiology: osmolytes · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.