Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zanjan rootstock increased root volume by 20.6%.

A claim from Differential effects of commercial and local Iranian pumpkin rootstocks on growth, yield, and postharvest quality of grafted cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zanjan rootstock increased root volume by 20.6%.

Taxon
Cucumis sativusCucumis sativuse0
Material
Zanjan rootstocke1
Treatment
Zanjan rootstocke1
Outcome
root volumee1
Direction
increasee1
Value
20.6%e1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grafting cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. cv. Saba hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–93
e1

“the Zanjan rootstock showed a significant increase in root volume (20.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1344

Title

Differential effects of commercial and local Iranian pumpkin rootstocks on growth, yield, and postharvest quality of grafted cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)

Mahdi Bikdeloo; Hamid Reza Roosta; Hamid Reza Abbasi; et al. Scientific Reports 2026. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-49714-6

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-46c0d74a34bb47327fef671681e85122a9844978042f3847b18bacf628073ce0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

grafting · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 55 positive, 4 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.