Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar nano fertilizer at two or three stages significantly increased straw yield, biological yield and harvest index in Nubaria 2 in both seasons.

A claim from Response of Some Faba Bean to Fertilizers Manufactured by Nanotechnology · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano fertilizer at two or three stages significantly increased straw yield, biological yield and harvest index in Nubaria 2 in both seasons.

Taxon
faba bean (Vicia faba L.)Vicia fabae2
Material
Nubaria 2e0
Treatment
foliar nano- fertilizer at two or three stagese0
Outcome
straw, and biological yield (tons/fed.) as well as harvest index %e0
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw, and biological yield (tons/fed.) as well as harvest index % with fertilizing “Nubaria 2” cultivar by foliar nano- fertilizer at two or three stages (vegetative, flowering or filling) in both growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1069
e1

“Significant increase was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–744
e2

“faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–221

Title

Response of Some Faba Bean to Fertilizers Manufactured by Nanotechnology

Mahmoud Gomaa; Essam kandil; Abuo Zeid Abuo Zeid; et al. Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches/Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches 2016. doi:10.21608/jalexu.2016.237120

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-470bbd71e88436a22f2eedaea23b04469cb3d6f9d88b51c1baec1dc6c6d3ec8b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

application · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 110 positive, 6 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 159 positive, 17 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

167 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

26 papers: 26 positive, 0 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.