Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Higher seed oil dosages caused 100% adult C. maculatus mortality.

A claim from INSECTICIDAL ACTIVITY OF PIPER GUINEENSE (SCHUMACH AND THONN) SEED OIL AGAINST CALLOSOBRUCHUS MACULATUS (F.) (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) IN STORED COWPEA SEEDS · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher seed oil dosages caused 100% adult C. maculatus mortality.

Treatment
Piper guineense seed oile1
Interactor
C. maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse0pest
Outcome
Adult C. maculatus mortalitye0
Direction
dose-dependente0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adult C. maculatus mortality was dose-dependent with higher dosages inducing 100% mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–985
e1

“Piper guineense seed oil in the control of cowpea bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) infestation on stored cowpea seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–580

Title

INSECTICIDAL ACTIVITY OF PIPER GUINEENSE (SCHUMACH AND THONN) SEED OIL AGAINST CALLOSOBRUCHUS MACULATUS (F.) (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) IN STORED COWPEA SEEDS

Chukwunonso O. Nzelu; Kingsley C. Emeasor; Nnaemeka J. Okonkwo International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH 2020. doi:10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i8.2020.875

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-4738f7496eecbd38c58f9ba89128dc7d48e11aaa6a01eba68104e31672b87ba9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Piper guineense · Callosobruchus maculatus · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.