Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Omitting K, S, Zn, and B did not significantly reduce tef grain yield compared with recommended N and P.

A claim from Effect of nutrient omissions on bread wheat and tef crops grain yield in Western Amhara, Ethiopia · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting K, S, Zn, and B did not significantly reduce tef grain yield compared with recommended N and P.

Treatment
omissions of potassium, sulfur, zinc, and borone0
Outcome
grain yield reductione0
Direction
did not show a significante0
Comparator
applied recommended nitrogen and phosphoruse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eragrostis tef
Eragrostis tef · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Rasbak assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“omissions of potassium, sulfur, zinc, and boron did not show a significant (P < 0.05) effect on bread wheat and tef grain yield reduction as compared to the applied recommended nitrogen and phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1446

Title

Effect of nutrient omissions on bread wheat and tef crops grain yield in Western Amhara, Ethiopia

Beamlaku Alemayehu; Zerfu Bazie; Tadele Amare; et al. PLoS ONE 2025. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0335174

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-47d6b7cd38aa66c3475e6cc712a829a0abfb771eb7205078a9a9b3855bb5ab4a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

potassium · yield · Eragrostis tef (tef)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

This claim is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.