Intervention effectmodel-written summary

CL-47031 at 0.75 and 0.375 lb Al/acre was superior to endrin for cutworm control.

A claim from Further Studies on Pale Western Cutworm Control in Kansas, 1968–6912 · 1970

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CL-47031 at 0.75 and 0.375 lb Al/acre was superior to endrin for cutworm control.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
CL-47031 (cyclic ethylene (diethoxyphosphinyl) dithioimidocarbonate) at 0.75 and 0.375 lb Al/acree0
Interactor
Agrotis orthogonia MorrisonAgrotis orthogoniae1pest
Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
endrin standarde0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrotis orthogonia
Agrotis orthogonia · InteractorCSU, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only CL-47031 (cyclic ethylene (diethoxyphosphinyl) dithioimidocarbonate) at 0.75 and 0.375 lb Al/acre and monocrotophos at 0.3 and 0.6 lb Al/acre were superior to the endrin standard.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–586
e1

“winter wheat in Kansas during 1968 and 1969 using 11 insecticides against Agrotis orthogonia Morrison.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–138

Title

Further Studies on Pale Western Cutworm Control in Kansas, 1968–6912

Lester J. Depew Journal of Economic Entomology 1970. doi:10.1093/jee/63.6.1842

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-49a55894fae9fa7162405935593e77b70db2bf91d4787e735f1e1f46e6f66841 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

ethene · Agrotis orthogonia · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.