Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Water deficit limited maize silk elongation more in apical and basal ear regions than in the middle.

A claim from Pre‐silking water deficit in maize induced kernel loss through impaired silk growth and ovary carbohydrate dynamics · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit limited maize silk elongation more in apical and basal ear regions than in the middle.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
silke0
Treatment
Water deficite0
Outcome
silk elongatione0
Direction
limitede0
Qualifier
apical and basal regions of the eare0
Comparator
middle regione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water deficit limited silk elongation in a manner inverse to the temporal pattern of silk initiation, more strongly in the apical and basal regions of the ear than in the middle region.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–765
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34

Title

Pre‐silking water deficit in maize induced kernel loss through impaired silk growth and ovary carbohydrate dynamics

Yebei Li; Shoubing Huang; Qingfeng Meng; et al. Plant-Environment Interactions 2024. doi:10.1002/pei3.10141

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-49d722c3cb1b9550c8885808131aaeeba1a9f711f52ff97dbe06b41ebbc04747 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

drought · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

385 papers: 77 positive, 308 negative or no effect

307 papers in the same direction as this claim · 77 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 385 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.