Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Organic acid treatments before sowing had no significant effect on uptake.

A claim from Enhanced Phytoextraction: In Search of EDTA Alternatives · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic acid treatments before sowing had no significant effect on uptake.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Treatment
organic acid treatmentse0
Outcome
uptakee0
Direction
any significant effecte0
Qualifier
when applied prior to sowinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither the NTA nor organic acid treatments had any significant effect on uptake when applied prior to sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1567
t0

“Enhanced Phytoextraction: In Search of EDTA Alternatives”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56
e1

“by Zea mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–582

Title

Enhanced Phytoextraction: In Search of EDTA Alternatives

E. Meers; M. Hopgood; E. Lesage; et al. International Journal of Phytoremediation 2004. doi:10.1080/16226510490454777

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-49e8ff466bae09053e520ba4a6e26978470c71d8a02218b323cc155aaaff8da3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

organic acid · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.