Claim · model-written summary
The medium biosolids rate increased soil extractable P relative to anhydrous NH.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- medium biosolids ratee0
- Outcome
- extractable Pe0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Value
- 114 vs. 16 mg kge0
- Comparator
- anhydrous NHe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The medium biosolids rate had significantly lower bulk density (1.05 vs. 1.22 g kg) and greater total C (0-10-cm depth) (16.9 vs. 9.4 g kg), mineralizable N (156 vs. 52 mg kg), and extractable P (114 vs. 16 mg kg) than anhydrous NH”
t0“Wheat”
Title
Long-Term Crop and Soil Response to Biosolids Applications in Dryland Wheat
Craig G. Cogger; Andy I. Bary; Ann C. Kennedy; et al. Journal of Environmental Quality 2013. doi:10.2134/jeq2013.05.0109
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Medium and high biosolids rates increased wheat grain yield relative to anhydrous NH.
- Intervention effect Medium and high biosolids rates increased wheat grain protein relative to anhydrous NH.
- Intervention effect The medium biosolids rate lowered soil bulk density relative to anhydrous NH.
- Intervention effect The medium biosolids rate increased soil total C relative to anhydrous NH.
- Intervention effect The medium biosolids rate increased soil mineralizable N relative to anhydrous NH.
- Intervention effect Biosolids raised P index vulnerability from low to medium.
- Observation Soil NO-N was nearly always below 10 mg N per kg soil.
- Intervention effect Medium and high biosolids rates increased bacteria/fungi ratios, Gram-negative bacteria and anaerobic bacteria markers.
- Recommendation The authors regard biosolids as an agronomically and environmentally sound practice for wheat-fallow systems.