Claim · model-written summary
Compound fertilizer increased NUE relative to common urea.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with common urea,NUE of coated urea and compound fertilizer was bigger”
t0“Summer Maize”
Title
Wang Pu Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 2006
Other claims from this paper (16)
- Intervention effect Increasing nitrogen rate increased maize yield.
- Intervention effect Increasing nitrogen rate increased water use amount.
- Intervention effect Increasing nitrogen rate increased water produce efficiency.
- Intervention effect Increasing nitrogen rate decreased nitrogen use efficiency.
- Observation Zhengdan958 had greater WPE than Nongda108.
- Observation Nongda108 had greater NUE than Zhengdan958.
- Observation Zhengdan958 WPE differed by fertilizer type, with the ranking damaged in the text.
- Observation Nongda108 showed smaller WPE differences among fertilizer treatments.
- Observation Compound fertilizer gave Nongda108 greater WPE than the other two fertilizer types, which were nearly equal.
- Intervention effect Coated urea increased NUE relative to common urea.
- Observation The NUE advantage was especially evident at 90 kg N/hm~2 for Zhengdan958.
- Observation The NUE advantage was especially evident at 180 kg N/hm~2 for Nongda108.
- Observation All treatments showed soil nitrogen deficit after the maize season.
- Association Soil nitrogen deficit decreased as nitrogen application rate increased.
- Observation Zhengdan958 generally had a greater soil nitrogen deficit than Nongda108.
- Observation Soil nitrogen apparent deficit differed by fertilizer type, but the ranking is damaged in the text.