Claim · model-written summary
The importance of ears per plant, kernels per ear and kernel weight varied with reduction timing.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- timing of stand reductione0
- Outcome
- relative importance of ears plant −1 , kernels ear −1 , and kernel weighte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The relative importance of ears plant −1 , kernels ear −1 , and kernel weight varied with timing of stand reduction.”
t0“Corn”
Title
Lucas A. Haag; Johnathon D. Holman; Joel Ransom; et al. Agronomy Journal 2017. doi:10.2134/agronj2015.0523
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Grain yields declined 17.2% at Garden City as stand reduction timing progressed from V5 to V14.
- Intervention effect Grain yields declined 10.7% at Prosper as timing progressed from V5 to V14.
- Intervention effect Yield declined 57.7% at Garden City when stand reduction increased from 0 to 75%.
- Intervention effect Yield declined 54.2% at Prosper when stand reduction increased from 0 to 75%.
- Intervention effect V11 and V14 stand reductions did not reduce grain yields on a 1:1 basis.
- Observation Yield plasticity at V11 was similar to V8.
- Recommendation Late-season stand-loss adjustment procedures should reflect corn yield-component plasticity, especially near V11.
- Association Yield component compensation importance varied with location or hybrid.