Claim · model-written summary
Mixing soil with sediments offered little yield advantage.
- Taxon
- sudangrass
Sorghum ×drummondiit0 - Outcome
- yield advantagee0
- Direction
- littlee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There appeared to be little yield advantage in mixing soil with sediments.”
t0“on sudangrass yields.”
Title
Agronomic use of scrubber sludge and soil as amendments to Lake Springfield sediment dredgings
Kenneth R. Olson; Robert L. Jones Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 1987. doi:10.1080/00224561.1987.12456040
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Sediment gave higher sudangrass yield than soil at the first cutting.
- Intervention effect Two percent scrubber sludge produced the highest average yield across soil and sediment combinations.
- Intervention effect Eight percent scrubber sludge sharply lowered yield across soil and sediment combinations.
- Observation Eight percent scrubber sludge adversely affected plant size and color.
- Intervention effect At the second and third cuttings, soil with 8% scrubber sludge gave the highest yields.
- Intervention effect Sediment with 8% scrubber sludge continued to have lower yields than other treatments.
- Intervention effect Soil alone outyielded sediment alone at the second and third cuttings.
- Observation Total weight across three cuttings suggested sediment was better than soil for sudangrass growth.
- Intervention effect Scrubber sludge increased sudangrass yield in soil-rich combinations.
- Observation Scrubber sludge had little effect on yield in sediment-rich combinations.