Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The combination produced the highest grain yield, 18.13 q/ha.

A claim from Effect of drought tolerant strains of phosphate solubilizing bacteria on growth and yield of Rabi sorghum · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination produced the highest grain yield, 18.13 q/ha.

Taxon
rabi sorghume1
Treatment
seed inoculation with MPKV PSB strain (Acc. No.1/2012) coupled with 100% recommended N and 75% recommended P2O5e0
Interactor
MPKV PSB strain (Acc. No.1/2012)e0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
18.13 q/hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“seed inoculation with MPKV PSB strain (Acc. No.1/2012) coupled with 100% recommended N and 75% recommended P2O5 recorded highest plant height (199.90 cm), grain yield (18.13 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–718
e1

“to evaluate the effect of drought tolerant phosphate solubilizing bacterial strain on growth, yield and ‘p’ uptake of rabi sorghum under dryland condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–510

Title

Effect of drought tolerant strains of phosphate solubilizing bacteria on growth and yield of Rabi sorghum

M.H. Shete; D.R. Murumkar; D.V. Indi; et al. Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development 2018. doi:10.5958/2231-6701.2018.00011.8

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-4d5fb9cc2d3693a7c0d78b24598f8415da18a9e50a610b9357d63ff7eb22c487 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · yield · SorghumResults differ

105 papers: 92 positive, 13 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    On nonlimed soil, high N with low P-K decreased sugar yields yield.

    Biomass and Sugar Yield Response of Sweet Sorghum to Lime and Fertilizer1 · 1985 · compared with high P or K

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Addition of Burkina phosphate to various doses of dry matter did not influence sorghum grain yield.

    Influence of the Leaf Biomass of Piliostigma reticulatum on Sorghum Production in North Sudanian Region of Burkina Faso · 2013

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Phosphorus rates did not significantly influence sorghum yield across seasons and combined sites.

    Nutrient Response Functions of Sorghum for Miesso District Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia · 2022

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    P application did not significantly affect sorghum yield.

    NPK requirement of hybrid jowar (CSH-1) in kharif season under rainfed condition · 1976

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Applied phosphate did not affect grain and fodder yields or yield components.

    Effect of nitrogen and phosphate fertilization on yield and yield components of hybrid sorghum · 1978

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Low-P soil conditions reduced sorghum grain yield.

    Sorghum breeding strategies for phosphorus-limited environments in Western Africa : from field to genome level · 2014

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    DMPP did not significantly increase sorghum grain yield or agronomic efficiency of fertiliser N use despite the N2O abatement.

    Comparison of grain yields and N2O emissions on Oxisol and Vertisol soils in response to fertiliser N applied as urea or urea coated with the nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate · 2016

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Phosphorus had no significant effect on sorghum grain yield.

    Fertilizer requirement of sorghum in sandy-clay loam soil of upper Damodar Valley · 1976

    Opposite direction

96 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

inoculation · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

76 papers: 68 positive, 8 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Bacterial inoculation did not increase sorghum forage or grain yield or nitrogen content.

    Nitrogen fixation associated with roots of sorghum and wheat · 1980 · compared with without inoculation

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Green forage yield under combined inoculation was not significantly different.

    Yield and quality of multi-cut forage sorghum (Sorghum sudanense) as influenced b y integrated nitrogen management · 2001 · compared with no inoculation of biofertilizer

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    inoculum mixture reduced 1000 kernel mass by 7.4%.

    Grain mold fungi and their effect on sorghum grain quality · 2011

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Azospirillum inoculation did not change yield components of rainfed sorghum after soybean.

    GRAIN SORGHUM GROWN AS SECOND CROP AND INOCULATED WITH Azospirillum brasilense ASSOCIATED WITH NITROGEN FERTILIZATION · 2021

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Panicles inoculated with both ergot and grain mould pathogens had relatively lower 1000-grain weight and percentage germination.

    Relationship between ergot and grain mould development in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) · 2006

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Liquid bio-fertilizer quantities beyond 2 ml/kg seed were not rewarding for sorghum productivity and profitability relative to 2 ml/kg seed.

    Quantifying response of azospirillum and phosphate solubilizing bacteria liquid inoculants seed treatment on productivity and profitability of kharif grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) · 2024 · compared with 2 ml/kg seed

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Without biofertilizer, sorghum grain yield was reduced.

    Impact of Row Configuration and Biofertilizers on Yield and Quality of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.) Intercropped with Cowpea in the Southern Laterites of Kerala, India · 2024

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Half RDF with biofertilizers was on par with RDF for sorghum dry matter production.

    DRYMATTER PRODUCTION AND NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY FODDER SORGHUM - INDIAN MUSTARD SEQUENCE AS AFFECTED BY NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT · 2006 · compared with RDF

    No difference from an alternative

67 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.