Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sugarcane purity and commercial cane sugar were higher with 100% recommended NPK fertilizer.

A claim from Effect of inorganic NPK fertilizers under different proportions on growth, yield and juice quality of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L). · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane purity and commercial cane sugar were higher with 100% recommended NPK fertilizer.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
100% recommended fertilizer at 225-112-168 NPK kg ha -1e1
Outcome
purity, commercial cane sugare1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e1

“tillers plant -1 , plant height, stem girth, internodes plant -1 ,millable canes, cane yield, leaf area plant -1 , leaf area index, crop growth rate, dry matter, brix, pol, purity, commercial cane sugar, NPK accumulation and uptake in plant and ratoon sugarcane crops were higher with the application of 100% recommended fertilizer at 225-112-168 NPK kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1249

Title

Effect of inorganic NPK fertilizers under different proportions on growth, yield and juice quality of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L).

Abdul Fatah Soomro Pure and Applied Biology 2014. doi:10.19045/bspab.2014.31002

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-4d7d593e402f4e769e442e99f0d1a9077ac03e0def132ead1383b44e6ecb001c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.