Paper · 2016 · Research on Crops

Best suited fertigation schedule and its effect on growth, yield, quality and uptake of nutrients of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) under Sustainable Sugarcane Initiative method

P. Christy Nirmala Mary; P. Jeyaseelan; R. Anitha

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at experimental farm, Sugarcane Research Station, Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu during 2013 to 2014 in sugarcane cv. CoC (SC) 24 plant crop to standardize the fertilizer schedule with 100, 125 and 150% of the recommended NPK through surface and sub-surface drip fertigation on growth characters, yield and yield attributing characters, plant nutrient content and uptake pattern of nutrients by sugarcane under Sustainable Sugarcane Initiative (SSI) method. The results of the experiment revealed that sub-surface drip irrigation system increased the cane yield and uptake of nutrients than surface drip irrigation method. Maximum tiller population of 176520/ha was recorded with sub-surface drip irrigation with 150% recommended dose of fertilizers followed by sub-surface fertigation with 125% recommended dose of fertilizers (163320/ha). Application of 150% recommended levels of NPK produced maximum cane yield (132.69 t/ha) followed by 125% recommended NPK (129.69 t/ha) and on a par with each other. Irrigation and fertilizer did not significantly influence the CCS content. Fertigation of 125% recommended dose of NPK recorded higher sugar yield of 16.62 t/ha. The higher benefit: cost ratio of 3.01 per rupee invested was observed in treatment received 125% recommended NPK under sub-surface drip fertigation system. The highest NPK uptake of 193.92, 91.57 and 375.89 kg/ha was noticed by the 150% recommended NPK. The 125% recommended NPK @ 375: 125: 250 kg/ha was the suitable type and level of fertilizer for obtaining high yield and quality of sugarcane under SSI system of sugarcane planting. SSI is the first step towards standardization of sugarcane cultivation focusing on improving productivity while reducing the agriculture foot print on planet earth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface drip irrigation increased cane yield compared with surface drip irrigation.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
sub-surface drip irrigation systeme0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
surface drip irrigation methode0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“sub-surface drip irrigation system increased the cane yield and uptake of nutrients than surface drip irrigation method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface drip irrigation increased nutrient uptake compared with surface drip irrigation.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
sub-surface drip irrigation systeme0
Outcome
uptake of nutrientse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
surface drip irrigation methode0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“sub-surface drip irrigation system increased the cane yield and uptake of nutrients than surface drip irrigation method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–645 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface drip irrigation with 150% recommended fertilizer produced the maximum tiller population of 176520/ha.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
sub-surface drip irrigation with 150% recommended dose of fertilizerse0
Outcome
tiller populatione0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
176520/hae0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum tiller population of 176520/ha was recorded with sub-surface drip irrigation with 150% recommended dose of fertilizers followed by sub-surface fertigation with 125% recommended dose of fertilizers (163320/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–864 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface fertigation with 125% recommended fertilizer produced 163320/ha tillers, following the 150% level.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
sub-surface fertigation with 125% recommended dose of fertilizerse0
Outcome
tiller populatione0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
163320/hae0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum tiller population of 176520/ha was recorded with sub-surface drip irrigation with 150% recommended dose of fertilizers followed by sub-surface fertigation with 125% recommended dose of fertilizers (163320/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–864 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150% recommended NPK level produced the maximum cane yield of 132.69 t/ha.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
150% recommended levels of NPKe0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
132.69 t/hae0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of 150% recommended levels of NPK produced maximum cane yield (132.69 t/ha) followed by 125% recommended NPK (129.69 t/ha) and on a par with each other.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1029 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 125% recommended NPK level yielded 129.69 t/ha of cane, statistically on par with 150% NPK.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
125% recommended NPKe0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
129.69 t/hae0
Qualifier
on a par with each othere0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of 150% recommended levels of NPK produced maximum cane yield (132.69 t/ha) followed by 125% recommended NPK (129.69 t/ha) and on a par with each other.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and fertilizer did not significantly influence CCS content.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Irrigation and fertilizere0
Outcome
CCS contente0
Direction
did not significantly influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“Irrigation and fertilizer did not significantly influence the CCS content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation at 125% recommended NPK produced higher sugar yield of 16.62 t/ha.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Fertigation of 125% recommended dose of NPKe0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
16.62 t/hae0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fertigation of 125% recommended dose of NPK recorded higher sugar yield of 16.62 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1191 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 125% recommended NPK level under subsurface drip fertigation gave the higher benefit:cost ratio of 3.01 per rupee invested.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
125% recommended NPK under sub-surface drip fertigation systeme0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.01 per rupee investede0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“The higher benefit: cost ratio of 3.01 per rupee invested was observed in treatment received 125% recommended NPK under sub-surface drip fertigation system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1348 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150% recommended NPK treatment had the highest N uptake of 193.92 kg/ha.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
150% recommended NPKe0
Outcome
NPK uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
193.92, 91.57 and 375.89 kg/hae0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest NPK uptake of 193.92, 91.57 and 375.89 kg/ha was noticed by the 150% recommended NPK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1446 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 125% recommended NPK at 375: 125: 250 kg/ha for high sugarcane yield and quality under SSI.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
125% recommended NPK @ 375: 125: 250 kg/hae0
Outcome
high yield and quality of sugarcanee0
Qualifier
under SSI system of sugarcane plantinge0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“The 125% recommended NPK @ 375: 125: 250 kg/ha was the suitable type and level of fertilizer for obtaining high yield and quality of sugarcane under SSI system of sugarcane planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1629 · show in text ↑

irrigation · nutrient: content · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

irrigation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 129 positive, 13 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.