Claim · model-written summary
Correlations for the remaining traits were greater in Composite M.
Zea maysNot reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“while for the rest of the traits they were greater in Comp. M, indicating greater share of the additive in the total genotypic variance in this composite.”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)”
Title
Vančetović, Jelena; Rošulj, Milorad; Pajić, Zorica RIK (Maize Research Institute Zemun Polje (Belgrade, Serbia)) 2019
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Association Grain yield correlation between S1 and HS families in Composite B was significant but too low for prediction.
- Association Grain yield correlation in Composite M was strong and highly significant.
- Association Grain yield correlations were lower than other trait correlations in both composites.
- Association Ear height correlations were higher in Composite B.
- Association 1000 kernel weight correlations were higher in Composite B.
- Observation The authors interpret Composite M as having a greater additive share of genotypic variance.
- Recommendation Combined S1-HS selection is recommended only for Composite M for grain yield.
- Recommendation For Composite B, the authors recommend S1 selection followed by low-intensity HS selection.