Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield correlation in Composite M was strong and highly significant.
Zea maysNot reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Greater correlation for the grain yield was obtained in Comp. M, it was strong and highly significant (0,663**).”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)”
Title
Vančetović, Jelena; Rošulj, Milorad; Pajić, Zorica RIK (Maize Research Institute Zemun Polje (Belgrade, Serbia)) 2019
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Association Grain yield correlation between S1 and HS families in Composite B was significant but too low for prediction.
- Association Grain yield correlations were lower than other trait correlations in both composites.
- Association Ear height correlations were higher in Composite B.
- Association 1000 kernel weight correlations were higher in Composite B.
- Association Correlations for the remaining traits were greater in Composite M.
- Observation The authors interpret Composite M as having a greater additive share of genotypic variance.
- Recommendation Combined S1-HS selection is recommended only for Composite M for grain yield.
- Recommendation For Composite B, the authors recommend S1 selection followed by low-intensity HS selection.